Conventional wisdom says that condition monitoring and on-line diagnostics of plant equipment and instrumentation and control systems can provide economic benefits to the nuclear utility. However, placing a dollar value on these benefits is difficult for a number of reasons. Maintenance crew sizes have a practical minimum to address staffing requirements. Reducing the amount of maintenance activity does not necessarily result in man-power savings. Regulatory constraints limit the extent to which probabilistic arguments can be relied on to avoid or defer preventive maintenance of safety-related equipment. Increasing the instrumentation of equipment to support advanced diagnostics can result in prohibitive hidden costs in change paperwork not to mention the direct cost of the sensors and cables. Although the use of wireless technology can offset this somewhat, without a clear understanding of the economic value of monitoring and diagnostics the utility has problems in deciding where its upgrade dollars are best spent; and the vendor has difficulty in developing products that delight the customer. In order to fill this gap in understanding, a workshop was held between monitoring and diagnostic experts at Westinghouse and utility representatives to define the value proposition for predictive diagnostics in operating plants. The objectives of this workshop were to: 1) determine where monitoring and diagnostics can be used to the benefit of the plant, 2) identify technologies available to apply to monitoring and diagnostics, 3) enumerate the barriers to installation of advanced monitoring and diagnostics, 4) establish value added propositions for efforts by the utility, by major vendors such as Westinghouse, and by sub-vendors, and 5) prioritize product development to provide the largest immediate benefit to the utilities. This paper discusses the outcome of that workshop and the directions of future developments in the area of monitoring and diagnostics of plant equipment and Instrumentation and Control.
Skip Nav Destination
16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
May 11–15, 2008
Orlando, Florida, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4816-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Determining the Value of Monitoring and Diagnostics
Bruce M. Cook
Bruce M. Cook
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Monroeville, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Bruce M. Cook
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Monroeville, PA
Paper No:
ICONE16-48915, pp. 1019-1024; 6 pages
Published Online:
June 24, 2009
Citation
Cook, BM. "Determining the Value of Monitoring and Diagnostics." Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. Volume 3: Thermal Hydraulics; Instrumentation and Controls. Orlando, Florida, USA. May 11–15, 2008. pp. 1019-1024. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE16-48915
Download citation file:
7
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Rotor Condition Monitoring for Improved Operational Safety of Offshore Wind Energy Converters
J. Sol. Energy Eng (May,2005)
Guidance and Methodologies for Managing Digital Instrumentation and Control Obsolescence
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (October,2016)
Development of the Prediction Technology of Cable Disconnection of In-Core Neutron Detector for the Future High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (October,2016)
Related Chapters
Constructing Dynamic Event Trees from Markov Models (PSAM-0369)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Introduction
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects
Developing Human Performance Measures (PSAM-0207)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)