The AP1000 is two-loop 1100 MWe advanced pressurized water reactor (PWR) that uses passive safety features to enhance plant safety and to provide significant and measurable improvements in plant simplification, reliability, investment protection and plant costs. The AP1000 uses proven technology, which builds on over 30 years of operating PWR experience. The AP1000 final design certification was approved by the NRC in December, 2005. A total of 34 Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) for operation of the AP1000 simulator have been prepared based on the AP1000 Emergency Response Guidelines (ERGs), background information documents and detailed plant information. These include 28 EOPs at power and 6 EOPs during shutdown. The AP1000 ERGs were developed by using the generic ERGs for the low pressure reference PWR plant as a basis. The AP1000 design differences from the reference plant were reviewed and reflected in the process of developing operational steps in each ERG. The provisions of the AP1000 PRA were also reviewed and incorporated into the ERGs. Although the AP1000 design does not require operator actions for the first 72 hours after accidents, the operator actions with both safety-related and nonsafety-related equipment have an important role to mitigate the consequence of accidents. In the event of a steam generator tube rupture (SGTR), although the AP1000 is designed so that no operator actions are required to recover from the event, there are actions that can be taken by the operator to limit the release of radioactive effluents from the ruptured SG. These actions include isolation of the ruptured SG and depressurization of the reactor coolant system (RCS) to terminate primary-to-secondary leakage, restoring reactor coolant inventory to ensure adequate core cooling and plant pressure control. It is expected that these operator actions should be incorporated into the ERG to reduce the fission product release. To support the development of the AP1000 ERGs, several transient and accident analyses were performed. These include analyses for LOCA, post-LOCA cooldown and depressurization, passive safety system termination, SGTR and faulted SG isolation. These analyses results were incorporated into the ERG background information documents. In the event of SGTR, several cases were analyzed, including consideration of operator recovery actions. These cases were modeled using the best-estimate state-of-art RELAP5 code. The analyses results show that operator recovery actions are effective for SGTR to be placed under operator control.
Skip Nav Destination
14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
July 17–20, 2006
Miami, Florida, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4246-0
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) for the AP1000 Simulator
Yuichi Hayashi,
Yuichi Hayashi
Kansai Electric Power Company, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Gianfranco Saiu,
Gianfranco Saiu
Ansaldo Nucleare S.p.A., Genoa, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard F. Wright
Richard F. Wright
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
Yuichi Hayashi
Kansai Electric Power Company, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
Gianfranco Saiu
Ansaldo Nucleare S.p.A., Genoa, Italy
Richard F. Wright
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA
Paper No:
ICONE14-89508, pp. 263-272; 10 pages
Published Online:
September 17, 2008
Citation
Hayashi, Y, Saiu, G, & Wright, RF. "Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) for the AP1000 Simulator." Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. Volume 5: Safety and Security; Low Level Waste Management, Decontamination and Decommissioning; Nuclear Industry Forum. Miami, Florida, USA. July 17–20, 2006. pp. 263-272. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE14-89508
Download citation file:
16
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
External Hazard Coinciding With Small Break LOCA—Thermohydraulic Calculation With System Code ATHLET
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (April,2020)
Emergency Response Guidance for Reactor Vessel Pressurized Thermal
Shock Events
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,1986)
Deterministic and Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis for Structural Integrity Assessment of Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2016)
Related Chapters
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Link between Level 2 PSA and Off-Site Emergency Preparedness (PSAM-0363)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
A PSA Update to Reflect Procedural Changes (PSAM-0217)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)