One of the factors limiting RMBK service life is the closure of the gas gap between the pressure tubes and the graphite masonry. The objective of the present work is to develop a mathematical model for Unit 2 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant (NPP) reactor, in Lithuania, which estimates the probability of the presence of a gas gap for different periods of operation. The calculations are based on collected data of graphite and pressure tube diameters and burn up measurements in period 1983–2005. There were no performed enough measurements for Unit 2, but big amount of statistical data was available for Unit 1. Therefore Unit 1 data properties were analyzed and constructed model was applied for INPP reactor Unit 2. The main analysis results are gas gap existence probabilities evaluation and the issued channel measuring strategies for the next planed preventive maintenance period for Ignalina NPP.
Skip Nav Destination
14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
July 17–20, 2006
Miami, Florida, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4245-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Ignalina NPP Unit 2 Gas Gap Probabilistic Evaluation
Jurgita Simaityte Volskiene,
Jurgita Simaityte Volskiene
Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania
Search for other works by this author on:
Juozas Augutis,
Juozas Augutis
Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania
Search for other works by this author on:
Eugenijus Uspuras
Eugenijus Uspuras
Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania
Search for other works by this author on:
Jurgita Simaityte Volskiene
Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania
Juozas Augutis
Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania
Eugenijus Uspuras
Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania
Paper No:
ICONE14-89478, pp. 637-640; 4 pages
Published Online:
September 17, 2008
Citation
Simaityte Volskiene, J, Augutis, J, & Uspuras, E. "Ignalina NPP Unit 2 Gas Gap Probabilistic Evaluation." Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. Volume 4: Computational Fluid Dynamics, Neutronics Methods and Coupled Codes; Student Paper Competition. Miami, Florida, USA. July 17–20, 2006. pp. 637-640. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE14-89478
Download citation file:
8
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Integrated Power Recovery Using Markov Modeling
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (November,2011)
A Framework for In-Service Life Extension of Hydroelectric Generation Assets
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (December,2022)
Bayesian Methodology for Probabilistic Description of Mechanical Parameters of Masonry Walls
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (June,2021)
Related Chapters
Constructing Dynamic Event Trees from Markov Models (PSAM-0369)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Development and Structure of the German Common Cause Failure Data Pool (PSAM-0020)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Use of PSA in Lisencing of EPR 1600 in Finland (PSAM-0160)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)