We performed an importance analysis of In-Service Testing (IST) components for Ulchin Unit 3 using the integrated evaluation method for categorizing component safety significance developed in this study. The importance analysis using the developed method is initiated by ranking the component importance using quantitative PSA information. The importance analysis of the IST components not modeled in the PSA is performed through the engineering judgment, based on the expertise of PSA, and the quantitative and qualitative information for the IST components. The PSA scope for importance analysis includes not only Level 1 & 2 internal PSA but also Level 1 external and shutdown/low power operation PSA. The importance analysis results of valves show that 167 (26.55%) of the 629 IST valves are HSSCs and 462 (73.45%) are LSSCs. Those of pumps also show that 28 (70%) of the 40 IST pumps are HSSCs and 12 (30%) are LSSCs.
Skip Nav Destination
10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
April 14–18, 2002
Arlington, Virginia, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3598-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Importance Analysis of In-Service Testing Components for Ulchin Unit 3
Dae-Il Kang,
Dae-Il Kang
Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Kil-Yoo Kim,
Kil-Yoo Kim
Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Jae-Joo Ha
Jae-Joo Ha
Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Dae-Il Kang
Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
Kil-Yoo Kim
Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
Jae-Joo Ha
Korea Advanced Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
Paper No:
ICONE10-22180, pp. 509-515; 7 pages
Published Online:
March 4, 2009
Citation
Kang, D, Kim, K, & Ha, J. "Importance Analysis of In-Service Testing Components for Ulchin Unit 3." Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Volume 4. Arlington, Virginia, USA. April 14–18, 2002. pp. 509-515. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE10-22180
Download citation file:
3
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Comparison of the HAZOP, FMEA, FRAM, and STPA Methods for the Hazard Analysis of Automatic Emergency Brake Systems
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2022)
Design Process Error Proofing: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of the Design Process
J. Mech. Des (May,2007)
SFTA-Based Approach for Safety/Reliability Analysis of Operational Use-Cases in Cyber-Physical Systems
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (September,2017)
Related Chapters
Functionality and Operability Criteria
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition
Functionality and Operability Criteria
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Second Edition: Criteria and Commentary on Select Aspects of the Boiler & Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes
Modeling of SAMG Operator Actions in Level 2 PSA (PSAM-0164)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)