Measurement of surface levels is essential in waste assessment and in clearing materials from nuclear licensed sites. Radiation measurements in general are much less accurate than most forms of engineering measurement, even in relatively simple conditions, such as radiochemical laboratories. Waste assessment during clearance is far more difficult. The areas of uncertainty include: (1) The intrinsic limitations of the equipment employed. For surface activity measurement, the detector is often a large area alpha + beta scintillation probe connected to a ratemeter. Any detector has an effective energy threshold below which it fails to register an event. The detector response is rarely uniform over the window area. The detector is connected to a ratemeter. The design of a ratemeter and the way it is set up will have a large influence on how easy the user finds it to classify correctly materials close to the exempt limit. (2)Calibration of the equipment. There is only a limited set of surface contamination sources available. Prediction of the response to other nuclides can be complicated. (3)Determination of the fingerprint. For many practical situations, the potential contaminant is a mixture of nuclides emitting a mixture of alpha, beta, gamma and X radiation. Any detector will have a response which depends on the radiation type and energy. Frequently, the response to the fingerprint of the most operationally robust and convenient detectors will be dominated by only a small fraction of the total activity present. It is thus vital that that fraction is well established and any area zoned so that the fraction remains reasonably stable. (4)The influence of natural activity in materials and of gamma radiation from elsewhere. Many building materials have levels of natural activity in the Bq/g region. These often vary significantly from sample to sample and area to area, particularly where buildings and equipment have been extended or modified. (5)Surface condition. For short range emissions such as alpha particles and low energy betas, the range for detection in air is a few mm. Any material covering the activity, such as paint or grease, will reduce the emission rate.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management
October 11–15, 2009
Liverpool, UK
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division and Environmental Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4408-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
The Level of Uncertainty in Materials Clearance Available to Purchase
Peter Burgess
Peter Burgess
Nuvia Ltd., Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Burgess
Nuvia Ltd., Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK
Paper No:
ICEM2009-16090, pp. 139-147; 9 pages
Published Online:
December 12, 2010
Citation
Burgess, P. "The Level of Uncertainty in Materials Clearance." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Volume 2. Liverpool, UK. October 11–15, 2009. pp. 139-147. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEM2009-16090
Download citation file:
13
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Radiographic Nondestructive Testing Simulations Using gate Software Toolkit
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (January,2020)
Assessment of Unsteady Pressure Measurement Uncertainty—Part I: Single Sensor Probe
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2016)
Development and Calibration of an Indigenous Spectroscopic System for Radiation Portal Monitor Application
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (July,2023)
Related Chapters
Calibration of Radiation Sources for Radiography
Nondestructive Testing Standards—A Review
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Dimensional Measurements and Calibration
Metrology and Instrumentation: Practical Applications for Engineering and Manufacturing