Many organisations are currently dealing with long standing legacy issues in clean up, decommissioning and demolition projects. Industry is required to ensure that all bulk articles, substances and waste arisings are adequately characterised and assigned to the correct disposal routes in compliance with UK legislation and best practice. It is essential that data used to support waste sentencing is of the correct type, quality and quantity, and that it is appropriately assessed in order to support defensible, confident decisions that account for inherent uncertainties. AMEC has adopted the Data Quality Objectives (DQO) based methodology and the software package Visual Sample Plan (VSP) to provide a better, faster, and more cost effective approach to meeting regulatory and client requirements, whilst minimising the time spent gathering data and assessing the information. The DQO methodology is based on a scientific approach that requires clear objectives to be established from the outset of a project and that there is a demonstration of acceptability of the results. Through systematic planning, the team develops acceptance or performance criteria for the quality of the data collected and for the confidence in the final decision. The systematic planning process promotes communication between all departments and individuals involved in the decision-making process thus the planning phase gives an open and unambiguous method to support the decisions and enables the decision-makers (technical authorities on the materials of concern) to document all assumptions. The DQO process allows better planning, control and understanding of all the issues. All types of waste can be sentenced under one controllable system providing a more defensible position. This paper will explain that the DQO process consists of seven main steps that lead to a detailed Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP). The process gives transparency to any assumptions made about the site or material being characterised and identifies individuals involved. The associated calculation effort is reduced using the statistically based sampling models produced with VSP. The first part of this paper explains the DQO based methodology and Visual Sample Plan and the second part shows how the DQO process has been applied in practice.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management
October 11–15, 2009
Liverpool, UK
Conference Sponsors:
- Nuclear Engineering Division and Environmental Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4408-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Systematic Planning Tool for Environmental Characterisation
Steven Wilcox,
Steven Wilcox
AMEC Nuclear UK Limited, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Wilkins,
Richard Wilkins
AMEC Nuclear UK Limited, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Martin Lyons
Martin Lyons
AMEC Nuclear UK Limited, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven Wilcox
AMEC Nuclear UK Limited, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK
Richard Wilkins
AMEC Nuclear UK Limited, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK
Martin Lyons
AMEC Nuclear UK Limited, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK
Paper No:
ICEM2009-16010, pp. 1-10; 10 pages
Published Online:
December 12, 2010
Citation
Wilcox, S, Wilkins, R, & Lyons, M. "A Systematic Planning Tool for Environmental Characterisation." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Volume 2. Liverpool, UK. October 11–15, 2009. pp. 1-10. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEM2009-16010
Download citation file:
9
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A New Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tool for Subsea Oil and Gas Asset Decommissioning
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (January,0001)
Lagrangian Relaxation Approach for Decentralized Decision Making in Engineering Design
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (March,2010)
An Approach for Testing Methods for Modeling Uncertainty
J. Mech. Des (September,2006)
Related Chapters
Dismantling
Decommissioning Handbook
Better Decisions
Total Quality Development: A Step by Step Guide to World Class Concurrent Engineering
Why Do We Avoid Conflict?
Conflict Resolution: Concepts and Practice (The Technical Manager's Survival Guides)