The leaching behaviour of spent fuel is of importance for the concept of direct storage of spent fuel. The aim of this study was to study UO2 irradiated fuel under simulated granitic repository conditions. In parallel with these spent fuel tests, SIMFUEL leaching studies were also performed. Direct comparisons between spent fuel and its chemical analogues, SIMFUEL, are often difficult. On one hand, because of the differences existing between spent fuel and SIMFUEL. E.g., for irradiated fuel: different origin and burnup, presence of intense radiation fields, hence radiolysis effects, or formation of cracks and pores due to the volatile fission products, hence larger surface area. On the other hand, because of different experimental procedures used by different authors.

This work presents results of sequential leaching experiments in synthetic granite water in equilibrium with a cylinder of granite at room temperature in air using spent UO2 fuel and SIMFUEL. The experimental conditions and procedure for irradiated and non-irradiated materials were kept similar as much as possible. The specimens used were UO2 (43 MWd/kgU) and SIMFUEL (simulating a burnup of 30 MWd/kgU) as non-irradiated chemical analogue.

A thermodynamic study by means of geochemistry codes was also performed. Differences both in fractional release and in uranium concentration in the leachate were found. The highest fractional release of uranium was measured for UO2 spent fuel. Candidate solid phases calculated for controlling the uranium solubility were soddyite ((UO2)2(SiO4)·2H2O) in the case of spent fuel and haiweete (Ca(UO2)2(Si2O5)3·5H2O) for SIMFUEL. Further work is ongoing to characterise the surfaces of the leached fuel samples and to try to confirm the preliminary attempts to identify reprecipitated secondary phases.

Comparison of some fission product release between spent fuel and SIMFUEL was also performed.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.