In spark ignition (SI) engines, high efficiencies are typically obtained near limits of stable operation which may result in high cycle-to-cycle variations (CCV). Traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools like Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations (RANS) may not predict the CCV in engines. Higher fidelity CFD tools like large-eddy simulations (LES) have been shown to capture these CCV. In this paper, LES of a motored transparent combustion chamber (TCC) engine is performed to simulate the CCV introduced during the gas exchange process. A grid convergence study is performed, and it is shown that using a 1 mm in-cylinder grid size leads to similar flowfield statistics as compared to using a 0.5 mm in-cylinder grid size. The phase-averaged mean and root mean square (RMS) flowfields predicted by LES are validated comprehensively using particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements. The validation is performed for 4 different crank angles, corresponding to the intake, compression, expansion and exhaust strokes, and for three different measurement planes. It is shown that LES is able to accurately predict the mean velocities, whereas the RMS velocity magnitudes are under-predicted. The inaccuracy in the RMS velocities are largest during the intake stroke, whereas good agreement with the measurements is observed during the expansion and exhaust strokes. A similarity index analysis provides a quantitative measure of the number of cycles that are required to be simulated to capture the flowfield statistics. This analysis is applied to both the PIV dataset and CFD dataset. It is shown that approximately 20 cycles are sufficient to obtain converged mean and RMS flowfields from the simulations, whereas the PIV measurements require approximately 40 cycles. Faster convergence for the LES results is because the simulations do not take into account additional uncertainties in the rpm, plenum pressures, boundary temperatures and so on, which are present in the experiments.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2017 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference
October 15–18, 2017
Seattle, Washington, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Internal Combustion Engine Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5832-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Using LES to Simulate Cycle-to-Cycle Variability During the Gas Exchange Process
Muhsin M. Ameen,
Muhsin M. Ameen
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Sibendu Som
Sibendu Som
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Muhsin M. Ameen
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Xiaofeng Yang
GM R&D, Pontiac, MI
Tang-Wei Kuo
GM R&D, Pontiac, MI
Sibendu Som
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Paper No:
ICEF2017-3591, V002T06A015; 14 pages
Published Online:
November 30, 2017
Citation
Ameen, MM, Yang, X, Kuo, T, & Som, S. "Using LES to Simulate Cycle-to-Cycle Variability During the Gas Exchange Process." Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference. Volume 2: Emissions Control Systems; Instrumentation, Controls, and Hybrids; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design and Mechanical Development. Seattle, Washington, USA. October 15–18, 2017. V002T06A015. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2017-3591
Download citation file:
46
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Knock on Heat Transfer in a Turbocharged Spark Ignition Engine
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2015)
Comparison of Near-Wall Flow and Heat Transfer of an Internal Combustion Engine Using Particle Image Velocimetry and Computational Fluid Dynamics
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2019)
Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Mixing and Autoignition of Hydrogen Fuel at Reheat Combustor Operating Conditions
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2012)
Related Chapters
Reciprocating Engine Performance Characteristics
Fundamentals of heat Engines: Reciprocating and Gas Turbine Internal Combustion Engines
The Stirling Engine
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
Lay-Up and Start-Up Practices
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration