Energy security and greenhouse gas reductions are thought to be two of the most urgent priorities for sustaining and improving the human condition in the future. Few places pit the two goals so directly in opposition to one another as the Alberta oil sands. Here, Canadian natural gas is burned in massive quantities to extract oil from one of North America’s largest native sources of carbon-intensive heavy oil. This conflict need not continue, however; non-emitting nuclear energy can replace natural gas as a fuel source in an economical and more environmentally sound way. This would allow for the continued extraction of transportation fuels without greenhouse gas emissions, while freeing up the natural gas supply for hydrogen feedstock and other valuable applications. Bitumen production in Alberta has expanded dramatically in the past five years as the price of oil has risen to record levels. This paper explores the feasibility and economics of using nuclear energy to power future oil sands production and upgrading activities, and puts forth several nuclear energy application scenarios for providing steam and electricity to in-situ and surface mining operations. This review includes the Enhanced CANDU 6, the Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR) and the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR). Based on reasonable projections of available cost information, nuclear energy used for steam production is expected to be less expensive than steam produced by natural gas at current natural gas prices and under $7/MMBtu (CAD). For electricity production, nuclear becomes competitive with natural gas plants at natural gas prices of $10–13/MMBtu (CAD). Costs of constructing nuclear plants in Alberta are affected by higher local labor costs, which this paper took into account in making these estimates. Although more definitive analysis of construction costs and project economics will be required to confirm these findings, there appears to be sufficient merit in the potential economics to support further study. A single 500MWth PBMR reactor is able to supply high-pressure steam for a 40,000 to 60,000 bpd Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) plant, whereas the CANDU and ACR reactors are unable to produce sufficient steam pressures to be practical in that application. The CANDU, ACR and PBMR reactors have potential for supplying heat and electricity for surface mining operations. The primary environmental benefit of nuclear energy in this application is to reduce CO2 emissions by up to 3.1 million metric tons per year for each 100,000 barrel per day (bpd) bitumen production SAGD facility, or 2.0 million metric tons per year for the replacement of 700MWe of grid electricity with a nuclear power plant. Should carbon emissions be priced, the economic advantages of nuclear energy would be dramatically improved such that with a $50/ton CO2e at the releases expected for typical projects using natural gas, breakeven gas prices for nuclear drop to less than $3.50/MMBtu, well below the current natural gas price of $10/MMBtu for SADG steam production.
Skip Nav Destination
Sign In or Register for Account
Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology
September 28–October 1, 2008
Washington, DC, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- ASME
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4855-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Integration of Nuclear Energy Into Oil Sands Projects
Ashley Finan
,
Ashley Finan
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew C. Kadak
Andrew C. Kadak
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Search for other works by this author on:
Ashley Finan
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Andrew C. Kadak
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Paper No:
HTR2008-58239, pp. 597-611; 15 pages
Published Online:
July 1, 2009
Citation
Finan, A, & Kadak, AC. "Integration of Nuclear Energy Into Oil Sands Projects." Proceedings of the Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology. Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Volume 2. Washington, DC, USA. September 28–October 1, 2008. pp. 597-611. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/HTR2008-58239
Download citation file:
Sign In
5
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Integration of Nuclear Energy Into Oil Sands Projects
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2010)
Tar on Tap
Mechanical Engineering (December,2008)
The Production of Jet Fuel From Alternative Sources
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,1986)
Related Chapters
Pipeline Integrity and Security
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards
General and Historical Information
Pipeline Integrity Assurance: A Practical Approach
Combined Cycle Power Plant
Energy and Power Generation Handbook: Established and Emerging Technologies