The benefits of eliminating instabilities in two-phase microchannel flow with inlet orifices come with costs. This study describes the tradeoffs between microchannels with and without inlet orifices, focusing on results from critical heat flux data obtained for various orifice sizes and mass fluxes. An adjustable inlet orifice controlled with a micrometer was placed in front of an array of 31 parallel microchannels each with a hydraulic diameter of 0.235 mm and a length of 1.33 cm. For mass fluxes ranging from 186 kg m−2 s−1 to 847 kg m−2 s−1, critical heat flux (CHF) data were obtained for 7 different orifice sizes. For low flow rates that provided a low quality saturated inlet condition, the difference in CHF values was found to be minimal between open and almost closed orifice conditions. The smallest orifice achieved a CHF value of 5 W cm−2 less than the largest orifice size for a mass flux of 186 kg m−2 s−1, and 7 W cm−2 less for a mass flux of 433 kg m−2 s−1. For mass fluxes higher than 433 kg m−2 s−1, subcooled conditions were present at the orifice inlet, and the highest CHF values occurred with an orifice hydraulic diameter of 35 percent of fully open. For the higher mass flux cases, orifice sizes in the range of 1.8 percent to 28 percent of fully open caused CHF to occur at lower values than less restrictive orifice sizes. This was due to loss of cooling capacity from rapid pressure drop through the orifice. Slightly higher average channel pressures also decrease the refrigerant’s latent heat of vaporization. For the orifice sizes from 35 to 70 percent of unrestricted flow, a very minimal increase in pressure drop over fully open inlet conditions occurred and the general trend was higher CHF values. Very small inlet orifices are beneficial for steady state conditions that do not approach CHF; however, overly restricting the flow at the inlet to microchannels reduces cooling capacity significantly and will cause early onset of CHF. A slightly restrictive inlet orifice will increase CHF.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2012 Heat Transfer Summer Conference collocated with the ASME 2012 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting and the ASME 2012 10th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels
July 8–12, 2012
Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Heat Transfer Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4478-6
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Critical Heat Flux in Microchannels With an Adjustable Inlet Orifice
Brent A. Odom,
Brent A. Odom
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Search for other works by this author on:
Carlos A. Ortiz,
Carlos A. Ortiz
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick E. Phelan
Patrick E. Phelan
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Search for other works by this author on:
Brent A. Odom
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Carlos A. Ortiz
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Patrick E. Phelan
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Paper No:
HT2012-58335, pp. 695-701; 7 pages
Published Online:
July 24, 2013
Citation
Odom, BA, Ortiz, CA, & Phelan, PE. "Critical Heat Flux in Microchannels With an Adjustable Inlet Orifice." Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Heat Transfer Summer Conference collocated with the ASME 2012 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting and the ASME 2012 10th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels. Volume 2: Heat Transfer Enhancement for Practical Applications; Fire and Combustion; Multi-Phase Systems; Heat Transfer in Electronic Equipment; Low Temperature Heat Transfer; Computational Heat Transfer. Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, USA. July 8–12, 2012. pp. 695-701. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/HT2012-58335
Download citation file:
8
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Microchannel Two-Phase Flow Oscillation Control With an Adjustable Inlet Orifice
J. Heat Transfer (December,2012)
Critical Heat Flux Condition and Post-Critical Heat Flux Heat Transfer of Carbon Dioxide at High Reduced Pressures in a Microchannel
J. Heat Mass Transfer (April,2023)
Effect of Cross-Sectional Perturbation on Critical Heat Flux Criteria in Microchannels
J. Heat Transfer (October,2013)
Related Chapters
Critical Heat Flux in Flow Boiling
Two-Phase Heat Transfer
Post-CHF Heat Transfer in Flow Boiling
Two-Phase Heat Transfer
Thermocavitation in a Microchannel with a Low Power Light Source
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)