In the present work a comparative study of phase-lagged boundary condition methods is carried out. The relative merits and advantages of time-shifted and the Fourier decomposition methods are compared. Both methods are implemented in a time marching Euler/Navier-Stokes solver and are applied to a flat plate helical fan with harmonically oscillating blades to perform the study. Results were obtained for subsonic as well as supersonic inflows. Results for subsonic inflow showed good comparisons with published results and between the two methods along with comparable computational costs. For the supersonic inflow, despite the presence of shocks at the periodic boundary results from both the methods compared well, however, Fourier decomposition method was computationally more expensive. For linear flowfield Fourier decomposition method is best suited, especially for work-station environment. The time-shifted method is better suited for CRAY category of computers where fast input-output devices are available.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 1999 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition
June 7–10, 1999
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- International Gas Turbine Institute
ISBN:
978-0-7918-7861-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Phase-Lagged Boundary Condition Methods for Aeroelastic Analysis of Turbomachines: A Comparative Study
R. Srivastava
,
R. Srivastava
The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Milind A. Bakhle
,
Milind A. Bakhle
The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Theo G. Keith, Jr.
,
Theo G. Keith, Jr.
The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
G. L. Stefko
G. L. Stefko
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Srivastava
The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Milind A. Bakhle
The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Theo G. Keith, Jr.
The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
G. L. Stefko
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH
Paper No:
99-GT-019, V004T03A005; 8 pages
Published Online:
December 16, 2014
Citation
Srivastava, R, Bakhle, MA, Keith, TG, Jr., & Stefko, GL. "Phase-Lagged Boundary Condition Methods for Aeroelastic Analysis of Turbomachines: A Comparative Study." Proceedings of the ASME 1999 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition. Volume 4: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; IGTI Scholar Award; General. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. June 7–10, 1999. V004T03A005. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/99-GT-019
Download citation file:
170
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Design Calculation Procedure for Shock-Free or Strong Passage Shock Turbomachinery Cascades
J. Eng. Power (April,1983)
Toward Excellence in Turbomachinery Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Hybrid Structured-Unstructured Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solver
J. Turbomach (April,2006)
Airfoil Deflection Characteristics During Rub Events
J. Turbomach (January,2012)
Related Chapters
Introduction
Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and Radial-Flow Turbine Design and Analysis
Approximate Analysis of Plates
Design of Plate and Shell Structures
Aerodynamic Performance Analysis
Axial-Flow Compressors