The flame speed is a central element not only in theoretical combustion and basic research but also a key parameter for several combustion models. Various methods to define and measure laminar flame speed have been applied. One method that is being relevant to determine flame speed and flame stretch (quantified by Markstein numbers) under high pressure and high temperature conditions is the bomb method, where an unsteady spherical expanding flame is investigated in a closed vessel. Especially for higher pressures, instabilities occur in the flame front of spherically expanding flames, due to the decreased flame thickness and diffusion processes. These so called cellular structures increase the flame surface and therefore the laminar flame speed cannot be determined in the usual manner. As high pressures are common under engine conditions, there is a need to be still able to determine the flame speed within these pressure ranges. By exposing the flame to a turbulent flow field, the vortex interactions are mainly responsible for the deformation of the flame surface. This fact can be used to deduce the laminar flame speed from a turbulent flame. In the present work, a turbulent flame speed model to determine unstretched laminar flame speed and Markstein numbers is introduced and validated. For this purpose the flame is exposed to a well-known turbulent flow field that is nearly homogenous and isotropic. By estimating the flame surface, the laminar flame speed can be calculated, using a turbulent stretch model as well as the flamelet assumption in an implicit approach. A high speed 2D laser imaging technique is used to capture the flame propagation. The most significant issue of this method is to correctly identify the surface and the volume of the flame, because solely a cross section of the flame surface can be visualized in the laser sheet. In case of spherical flames, the radius of the cross section corresponds to the flame surface and volume whereas a single radius is not sufficient to quantify a turbulent flame. The idea is to use the circumference of the cross section in a power law approach to quantify the cellular structures as a mean. The implicit model has been validated for methane and hydrogen flame speed at various equivalence ratios at atmospheric and elevated pressure. The results are in a good agreement with laminar determined flame speed and also the Markstein number is obtained qualitatively correct. Although the flame surface and volume cannot be determined directly by 2D measurement techniques, a model has been developed to determine laminar unstretched flame speed and Markstein numbers by investigating unsteady propagating flames in a turbulent flow field.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
June 13–17, 2016
Seoul, South Korea
Conference Sponsors:
- International Gas Turbine Institute
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4976-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Determination of Laminar Flame Speed and Markstein Numbers Deduced From Turbulent Flames Using the Bomb Method Available to Purchase
Tobias Baust,
Tobias Baust
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Habisreuther,
Peter Habisreuther
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Nikolaos Zarzalis
Nikolaos Zarzalis
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Tobias Baust
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Peter Habisreuther
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Nikolaos Zarzalis
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Paper No:
GT2016-57305, V04BT04A007; 11 pages
Published Online:
September 20, 2016
Citation
Baust, T, Habisreuther, P, & Zarzalis, N. "Determination of Laminar Flame Speed and Markstein Numbers Deduced From Turbulent Flames Using the Bomb Method." Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 4B: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions. Seoul, South Korea. June 13–17, 2016. V04BT04A007. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-57305
Download citation file:
21
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Experiments on Flame Flashback in a Quasi-2D Turbulent Wall Boundary Layer for Premixed Methane-Hydrogen-Air Mixtures
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2011)
In Situ Species Concentration Measurements in Ammonia-Mix Flames Using FTIR Spectroscopy
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2025)
Lean Blowout Limits and NO x Emissions of Turbulent, Lean Premixed, Hydrogen-Enriched Methane/Air Flames at High Pressure
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2007)
Related Chapters
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Basic Concepts
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)