This paper presents the fundamentals of an evolutionary, thermo-economic plant design methodology, which enables an improved and customer-focused optimization of the bottoming cycle of a large Combined Cycle Power Plant. The new methodology focuses on the conceptual design of the CCPP applicable to the product development and the pre-acquisition phase. After the definition of the overall plant configuration such as the number of gas turbines used, the type of main cooling system and the related fix investment cost, the CCPP is optimized towards any criteria available in the process model (e.g. lowest COE, maximum NPV/IRR, highest net efficiency). In view of the fact that the optimization is performed on a global plant level with a simultaneous hot- and cold- end optimization, the results clearly show the dependency of the HRSG steam parameters and the related steam turbine configuration on the definition of the cold end (Air Cooled Condenser instead of Direct Cooling). Furthermore, competing methods for feedwater preheating (HRSG recirculation, condensate preheating or pegging steam), different HRSG heat exchanger arrangements as well as applicable portfolio components are automatically evaluated and finally selected. The developed process model is based on a fixed superstructure and copes with the full complexity of today’s bottoming cycle configurations as well with any constraints and design rules existing in practice. It includes a variety of component modules that are prescribed with their performance characteristics, design limitations and individual cost. More than 100 parameters are used to directly calculate the overall plant performance and related investment cost. Further definitions on payment schedule, construction time, operation regime and consumable cost results in a full economic life cycle calculation of the CCPP. For the overall optimization the process model is coupled to an evolutionary optimizer, whereas around 60 design parameters are used within predefined bounds. Within a single optimization run more than 100’000 bottoming cycle configurations are calculated in order to find the targeted optimum and thanks to today’s massive parallel computing resources, the solution can be found over night. Due to the direct formulation of the process model, the best cycle configuration is a result provided by the optimizer and can be based on a single-, dual or triple pressure system using non-reheat, reheat or double reheat configuration. This methodology enables to analyze also existing limitations and characteristics of the key components in the process model and assists to initiate new developments in order to constantly increase the value for power plant customers.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
May 14–17, 2007
Montreal, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- International Gas Turbine Institute
ISBN:
0-7918-4791-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Advanced Bottoming Cycle Optimisation for Large Alstom CCPP
Michael Vollmer,
Michael Vollmer
ALSTOM, Baden, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Camille Pedretti,
Camille Pedretti
ALSTOM, Baden, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Manfred Wirsum
Manfred Wirsum
ALSTOM, Birr, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Vollmer
ALSTOM, Baden, Switzerland
Camille Pedretti
ALSTOM, Baden, Switzerland
Alexander Ni
ALSTOM, Birr, Switzerland
Manfred Wirsum
ALSTOM, Birr, Switzerland
Paper No:
GT2007-27578, pp. 941-951; 11 pages
Published Online:
March 10, 2009
Citation
Vollmer, M, Pedretti, C, Ni, A, & Wirsum, M. "Advanced Bottoming Cycle Optimisation for Large Alstom CCPP." Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 2: Turbo Expo 2007. Montreal, Canada. May 14–17, 2007. pp. 941-951. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2007-27578
Download citation file:
8
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Degradation Effects on Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance—Part III: Gas and Steam Turbine Component Degradation Effects
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2004)
Importance of Auxiliary Power Consumption for Combined Cycle Performance
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2011)
Second Law Efficiency of the Rankine Bottoming Cycle of a Combined Cycle Power Plant
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2010)
Related Chapters
Combined Cycle Power Plant
Energy and Power Generation Handbook: Established and Emerging Technologies
Lay-Up and Start-Up Practices
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration
Introduction
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration