Proper functioning of the pitch system is essential to both normal operation and safety critical shut down of modern multi megawatt wind turbines. Several studies on field failure rates for such turbines show that pitch systems are a major contributor to failures which entails an increased risk. Thus, more reliable and safe concepts are needed. A review of patents and patent applications covering fluid power pitch concepts, reveals that many propose closed-type hydraulic systems. This paper proposes a closed-type concept with a bootstrap reservoir. In contrary to a conventional system where a common supply delivers to cylinder drives mounted at each blade, the concept using bootstraps are fully contained in the rotating hub and act as standalone actuators. Clear advantages of such systems are a reduction of high pressure leakage paths, but in turn more components are used for each supply circuit. To allow for comparison, this paper deals with a risk-based analysis of these two types of pitch concepts. The risk-based analysis is conducted according to a qualitative failure analysis method which is verified against recent field failure data for hydraulic pitch systems. The method combines Fault Tree Analysis and Failure Mode and Effect Criticality Analysis in a systematic framework that lowers the bias issues normally encountered for qualitative studies. Under the assumption of similar components, the results indicate an equal risk of the two concepts. A decreased reliability is seen for the bootstrap concept due to additional components in the supply circuit compared to the conventional system. It is noted that careful selection of high reliable pumps and relief valves may significantly reduce risk and increase reliability of the bootstrap concept.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME/BATH 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control
October 16–19, 2017
Sarasota, Forida, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Fluid Power Systems and Technology Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5833-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Risk-Based Comparative Study of Fluid Power Pitch Concepts Available to Purchase
Jesper Liniger,
Jesper Liniger
Aalborg University, Esbjerg, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Henrik C. Pedersen,
Henrik C. Pedersen
Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohsen Soltani
Mohsen Soltani
Aalborg University, Esbjerg, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Jesper Liniger
Aalborg University, Esbjerg, Denmark
Henrik C. Pedersen
Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
Mohsen Soltani
Aalborg University, Esbjerg, Denmark
Paper No:
FPMC2017-4222, V001T01A007; 9 pages
Published Online:
December 4, 2017
Citation
Liniger, J, Pedersen, HC, & Soltani, M. "Risk-Based Comparative Study of Fluid Power Pitch Concepts." Proceedings of the ASME/BATH 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. ASME/BATH 2017 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. Sarasota, Forida, USA. October 16–19, 2017. V001T01A007. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/FPMC2017-4222
Download citation file:
19
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Application-Driven Reliability Research of Next Generation for Automotive Electronics: Challenges and Approaches
J. Electron. Packag (March,2018)
Magnetic Force and Thermal Expansion as Failure Mechanisms of Electrothermal MEMS Actuators Under Electrostatic Discharge Testing
J. Appl. Mech (September,2007)
Accelerated Vibration Reliability Testing of Electronic Assemblies Using Sine Dwell With Resonance Tracking
J. Electron. Packag (December,2018)
Related Chapters
Later Single-Cylinder Engines
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
Development and Structure of the German Common Cause Failure Data Pool (PSAM-0020)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Insights and Results of the Shutdown PSA for a German SWR 69 Type Reactor (PSAM-0028)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)