The fluid and structural response of two different membrane wing Micro Air Vehicles is studied through computation and experiment. A (three) batten-reinforced fixed wing membrane micro air vehicle is used to determine the effect of membrane prestrain and fixed angle of attack on flutter and limit cycle behavior of fixed wing membrane Micro Air Vehicles. For each configuration tested, flutter and subsequent limit cycle oscillations are measured in wind tunnel tests and predicted using an aeroelastic computational model consisting of a nonlinear finite element model coupled to a vortex lattice solution of the Laplace equation and boundary conditions. Correlation between the predicted and measured onset of limit cycle oscillation is good as is the prediction of the amplitude of the limit cycle at the trailing edge of the lower membrane. A direct correlation between levels of strain and the phase of the membranes during the limit cycle is found in the computation and thought to also occur in the experiment. The second membrane wing micro air vehicle configuration is that of a plunging membrane airfoil model. This model is studied computationally using a sixth-order finite difference solution of the Navier-Stokes equations coupled to a nonlinear string finite element model. The effect, on the structural and fluid response, of plunging Strouhal number, reduced frequency and static angle of attack is examined. At two degree angle of attack, and Strouhal number of 0.2, the effect of increasing the plunging reduced frequency is to decrease the sectional lift coefficient and increase the sectional drag coefficient. At this angle of attack, minimal change in the sectional lift coefficient is found when increasing from a Strouhal number of 0.2 to 0.5 at reduced frequencies of 0.5 and 5.903, the lowest and highest values of this parameter which are studied in this work. For this angle of attack the maximum change which occurs when increasing the Strouhal number from 0.2 to 0.5 is at a reduced frequency of 1.5. When the effect of angle of attack is studied, it is found that at a Strouhal number of 0.5 and reduced frequency of 1.5 the plunging flexible model demonstrates improved lift characteristics over the fixed flexible airfoil case. The greatest improvement occurs at an angle of attack of 2 degrees followed by 10 degrees and then 6 degrees. Finally the effect on the flow characteristics of airfoil flexibility is investigated by increasing the membrane pre-strain from a nominal value of 5 percent to that of 20 percent. This increase in pre-strain results in a reduced value of sectional lift coefficient as compared the 5 percent pre-strain case at the same fixed angle of attack, Strouhal number and reduced frequency.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting
August 2–6, 2009
Vail, Colorado, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Fluids Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4372-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Aeroelastic Analysis of Membrane Micro Air Vehicles
Peter J. Attar,
Peter J. Attar
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Search for other works by this author on:
Raymond E. Gordnier,
Raymond E. Gordnier
Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Jordan W. Johnston,
Jordan W. Johnston
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Search for other works by this author on:
William A. Romberg,
William A. Romberg
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Search for other works by this author on:
Ramkumar N. Parthasarathy
Ramkumar N. Parthasarathy
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter J. Attar
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Raymond E. Gordnier
Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH
Jordan W. Johnston
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
William A. Romberg
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Ramkumar N. Parthasarathy
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Paper No:
FEDSM2009-78575, pp. 1809-1824; 16 pages
Published Online:
July 26, 2010
Citation
Attar, PJ, Gordnier, RE, Johnston, JW, Romberg, WA, & Parthasarathy, RN. "Aeroelastic Analysis of Membrane Micro Air Vehicles." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting. Volume 1: Symposia, Parts A, B and C. Vail, Colorado, USA. August 2–6, 2009. pp. 1809-1824. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2009-78575
Download citation file:
11
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Aeroelastic Analysis of Membrane Microair Vehicles—Part I: Flutter and Limit Cycle Analysis for Fixed-Wing Configurations
J. Vib. Acoust (April,2011)
Lift-Generation and Moving-Wall Flow Control Over a Low Aspect Ratio Airfoil
J. Fluids Eng (January,2018)
Aeroelastic Analysis of Membrane Microair Vehicles—Part II: Computational Study of a Plunging Membrane Airfoil
J. Vib. Acoust (April,2011)
Related Chapters
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Vortex-Induced Vibration
Flow Induced Vibration of Power and Process Plant Components: A Practical Workbook
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design