We made on numerical analysis of phase difference between pressure along the pipe axis and given oscillatory flow velocity in an straight pipe under a nonuniform steady magnetic field. In the analysis, a few cases under the assumption of numerical condition were conducted on: the first is taking into account the least compressibility of the fluid with using the obtained experimental data of the bulk modulus, the second taking into account the nonuniform distribution of mass concentration of particles, and the thrid taking into account the aggregation with the number of aggregated particles proposing as a prorate spheroid. By considering the three effects of the least compressibility and the nonuniform distribution of mass concentration, the aggregation as a prorate spheroid, the phase difference varies quantitatively at the lowest Womersley number range. And then, the numerical results were compared with the experimental data.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME/JSME 2003 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference
July 6–10, 2003
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Fluids Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3697-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Oscillatory Flow of a Magnetic Fluid in a Pipe at Low Frequency Range Under a Magnetic Field: Phase Difference of Pressure
Kunio Shimada,
Kunio Shimada
Akita Prefecture University, Honjyo, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Shigemitsu Shuchi,
Shigemitsu Shuchi
Akita Prefecture University, Honjyo, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Shinichi Kamiyama
Shinichi Kamiyama
Akita Prefecture University, Honjyo, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Kunio Shimada
Akita Prefecture University, Honjyo, Japan
Shigemitsu Shuchi
Akita Prefecture University, Honjyo, Japan
Shinichi Kamiyama
Akita Prefecture University, Honjyo, Japan
Paper No:
FEDSM2003-45037, pp. 1553-1558; 6 pages
Published Online:
February 4, 2009
Citation
Shimada, K, Shuchi, S, & Kamiyama, S. "Oscillatory Flow of a Magnetic Fluid in a Pipe at Low Frequency Range Under a Magnetic Field: Phase Difference of Pressure." Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2003 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference. Volume 2: Symposia, Parts A, B, and C. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. July 6–10, 2003. pp. 1553-1558. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2003-45037
Download citation file:
10
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Unified Approach for Flow Analysis of Magnetorheological Fluids
J. Appl. Mech (July,2011)
Numerical Prediction of Cavitating MHD Flow of Electrically Conducting Magnetic Fluid in a Converging-Diverging Nozzle
J. Appl. Mech (November,2004)
On Fluid Compressibility in Switch-Mode Hydraulic Circuits—Part I: Modeling and Analysis
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March,2013)
Related Chapters
Completing the Picture
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
Effect of Pump Inlet Conditions on Hydraulic Pump Cavitation: A Review
Hydraulic Failure Analysis: Fluids, Components, and System Effects
Kinetic Theory
Collective Phenomena in Plasmas and Elsewhere: Kinetic and Hydrodynamic Approaches