There has been a recent increase in research related to supernumerary robotic arms. A challenge with supernumerary robotic arms is how to operate them effectively. One solution is to use the foot to teleoperate the arm. That frees the person to use their arms for other tasks. However, unlike hand interfaces, it is not known how to create effective foot control for robotic teleoperation. This paper presents an experiment to compare position and rate control methods for foot interfaces. A foot interface is presented that can be used for both position and rate control. A human subject experiment uses 2D positioning tasks to evaluate the effectiveness of each control method. These same tasks are tested with a hand interface to provide a baseline for comparison. Results show that, similar to the hand, position control performs faster than rate control when using the foot.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2018 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference
September 30–October 3, 2018
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Dynamic Systems and Control Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5191-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparison Between Position and Rate Control Using a Foot Interface
Zachary J. Dougherty,
Zachary J. Dougherty
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN
Search for other works by this author on:
Ryder C. Winck
Ryder C. Winck
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN
Search for other works by this author on:
Zachary J. Dougherty
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN
Ryder C. Winck
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN
Paper No:
DSCC2018-9115, V003T32A011; 7 pages
Published Online:
November 12, 2018
Citation
Dougherty, ZJ, & Winck, RC. "Comparison Between Position and Rate Control Using a Foot Interface." Proceedings of the ASME 2018 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Volume 3: Modeling and Validation; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Application; Unmanned Ground and Aerial Vehicles; Vibration in Mechanical Systems; Vibrations and Control of Systems; Vibrations: Modeling, Analysis, and Control. Atlanta, Georgia, USA. September 30–October 3, 2018. V003T32A011. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2018-9115
Download citation file:
35
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Robotic Time-Varying Force Tracking in Position-Based Impedance Control
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,2016)
Development of an Automatically Adjustable Colonoscope
J. Med. Devices (June,2011)
Position Control of a Rehabilitation Robotic Joint Based on Neuron Proportion-Integral and Feedforward Control
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam (April,2012)
Related Chapters
Why Use GD&T?
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook: Applications, Analysis & Measurement
An Adaptive Fuzzy Control for a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom System
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17
Real-Time Implementation and Intelligent Position Control of a Mass-Spring-Damper System
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 16