As a precursor to capsize, marginal stability, resulting from incorrect loading conditions and crew negligence, poses a serious danger to ships. Therefore, as a benchmark problem for preventing capsize, the use of an actively controlled pendulum for the stabilization of a marginally stable ship was analyzed. Lyapunov stability criteria and closed loop eigenvalues were used to evaluate the extent to which a proposed pendulum controller could cope with different ship stability conditions. Equations of motion were solved to observe the controller’s performance under different damping conditions. The behavior of the controller yielded the following results: a marginally stable ship can be stabilized, as long as there is no right hand plane zero; energy dissipation is key to the stabilization of a marginally stable ship; the controller must have knowledge of the ship’s stability to prevent controller-induced excitation; and a stabilized tilted ship is more robust to external disturbances than a stabilized upright ship.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2017 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference
October 11–13, 2017
Tysons, Virginia, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Dynamic Systems and Control Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5828-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Justifying the Stabilization of a Marginally Stable Ship
David Shekhtman,
David Shekhtman
Cooper Union, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Dirk M. Luchtenburg
Dirk M. Luchtenburg
Cooper Union, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
David Shekhtman
Cooper Union, New York, NY
Dirk M. Luchtenburg
Cooper Union, New York, NY
Paper No:
DSCC2017-5116, V002T12A003; 10 pages
Published Online:
November 14, 2017
Citation
Shekhtman, D, & Luchtenburg, DM. "Justifying the Stabilization of a Marginally Stable Ship." Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Volume 2: Mechatronics; Estimation and Identification; Uncertain Systems and Robustness; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Manufacturing; Intelligent Transportation and Vehicles; Sensors and Actuators; Diagnostics and Detection; Unmanned, Ground and Surface Robotics; Motion and Vibration Control Applications. Tysons, Virginia, USA. October 11–13, 2017. V002T12A003. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2017-5116
Download citation file:
40
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Closed-Loop Dynamic Analysis of a Rotary Inverted Pendulum for Control Design
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March,2012)
Vibration Suppression of a Four-Degrees-of-Freedom Nonlinear Spring Pendulum via Longitudinal and Transverse Absorbers
J. Appl. Mech (January,2012)
An Experimental Investigation of Parametric Rolling in Head Waves
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2001)
Related Chapters
Smart Semi-Active Control of Floor-Isolated Structures
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17
Dynamic Simulations to Become Expert in Order to Set Fuzzy Rules in Real Systems
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)
Design and Performance of PD and LQR Controller for Double Inverted Pendulum System
International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE 2012)