In recent years, numerous control algorithms for connected and automated vehicles have emerged which focus on modifying driving strategy in order to reduce fuel usage. Referred to as “dynamic eco-driving,” these technologies have realized the possibility for additional fuel savings by utilizing information technologies rather than mechanics. The exact methodologies, however, are diverse. Three primary categories of dynamic eco-driving methodologies are identified and described: 1) ad-hoc methods, designed for the purpose of saving fuel but not considering optimality, 2) classical optimization methods, which use fuel usage modeling to solve an optimal control problem forwards in time, whether numerically or analytically, and 3) optimization by dynamic programming, in which a fuel usage-oriented cost function is minimized but solved backwards in time in discrete steps. Representatives from each of these categories are studied and implemented in simulation for comparison. Advantages and disadvantages of each relative to multiple performance measures are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2015 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference
October 28–30, 2015
Columbus, Ohio, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Dynamic Systems and Control Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5725-0
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Intelligent Vehicle Fuel Saving Technologies: Comparing Three Primary Categories of Methods Available to Purchase
Danielle Fredette,
Danielle Fredette
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Junbo Jing,
Junbo Jing
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Umit Ozguner
Umit Ozguner
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Danielle Fredette
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Junbo Jing
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Umit Ozguner
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Paper No:
DSCC2015-9869, V002T31A003; 8 pages
Published Online:
January 12, 2016
Citation
Fredette, D, Jing, J, & Ozguner, U. "Intelligent Vehicle Fuel Saving Technologies: Comparing Three Primary Categories of Methods." Proceedings of the ASME 2015 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Volume 2: Diagnostics and Detection; Drilling; Dynamics and Control of Wind Energy Systems; Energy Harvesting; Estimation and Identification; Flexible and Smart Structure Control; Fuels Cells/Energy Storage; Human Robot Interaction; HVAC Building Energy Management; Industrial Applications; Intelligent Transportation Systems; Manufacturing; Mechatronics; Modelling and Validation; Motion and Vibration Control Applications. Columbus, Ohio, USA. October 28–30, 2015. V002T31A003. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2015-9869
Download citation file:
21
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Continuous Optimal Infeed Control for Cylindrical Plunge Grinding, Part 2: Controller Design and Implementation
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (May,2004)
Dynamic Optimization of Lean Burn Engine Aftertreatment
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (June,2001)
Differential Transformation and Its Application to Nonlinear Optimal Control
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,2009)
Related Chapters
Dynamic Programming
Engineering Optimization: Applications, Methods, and Analysis
A Simulation-Based Optimization Framework for Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows and Stochastic Travel and Service Time
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 20
Feedback-Aided Minimum Joint Motion
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution